Our own sidewalk scholars, Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris and Renia Ehrenfeucht, have been pounding the pavement tracking the furious battles that have been fought on sidewalks over
free speech, public access and conflicting uses. In their new book, Sidewalks: Conflict and Negotiation over Public Space, reveals the policies governing sidewalks in five cities — Los Angeles, New York,
Boston, Miami and Seattle — to explain why some cities have a
vibrant sidewalk culture and in other cities, sidewalks are devoid of
life.
Loukaitou-Sideris sat down with UCLA Today to talk about it. Here's a taste.
What first intrigued you about sidewalks?
Coming from Athens, Greece, where there is a very intensive use of
sidewalks, I experienced a cultural shock when I first came to this
country in 1983 as a graduate student and saw that sidewalks were empty
in most places. This was so much in contrast to my own life
experiences. I always had this question: Why are American sidewalks
empty? What happened to the pedestrians? The book really responds to
these questions.
What American cities do the best job of promoting sidewalk-walking?
East coast cities have a longer history of mixed use. Having mixed
uses – where, for example, supermarkets occupy the ground floor of a
building and apartments are on the upper floors — brings more people
onto the streets. Boston and New York have more interesting sidewalks
because they have many more mixed-use buildings and shorter blocks. But
in western cities, you'll see endless subdivisions, established by
zoning. It's helped create what we call the "dormitory" suburb. This
has taken the life out of sidewalks. There are even some suburbs that
have been built without sidewalks because homeowners want their
privacy.
Read more here. And remember, don't step on a crack.....
Comments